In contrast, judicial exclusion allows members of an LLC, without contractual means to avoid an impasse or other impasse, to ask the court to dissociate a member who participates in “unlawful conduct,” that “adversely and substantially” harms LLC`s business, or “intentionally or stubbornly” “substantially violates the company agreement” or any material breach of the obligations of Member No. 10 D of the Revised Act. It also permits dissociation by the court when a member maintains on the bodies a behavior “that makes it reasonably impossible to expedite activities and dealings with the person as a member.” 11 Judicial expulsion is therefore particularly useful where unforeseen conflicts arise after the creation of an LLC and the company agreement does not contain any method for resolving those conflicts. Typical claims for legal breach of the duty of loyalty relate to the management of members who do not: for example, in IE Test, LLC v. Carroll, 2014 WL 8132907 (Super. == These common clauses exist because there are a large number of cases that are negotiated on the underlying topics they want to deal with contractually. For example, a frequent dispute between LLCs members involves unauthorized business expenses for personal use. In most enterprise agreements, ownership of assets is held exclusively in the name of the company, with no member entitled to the company`s patrimony or participation in the ownership of those assets, except indirectly due to the member`s participation in the ownership of the company. In addition, most company agreements provide that no member has the right to allocate the assets of the enterprise or to obtain certain assets in the event of liquidation of the enterprise or in the event of distribution of the company.
. . .